Legislature(2001 - 2002)
2001-05-03 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2001-05-03 House Journal Page 1510 SB 88 The following was read the second time: SENATE BILL NO. 88 "An Act relating to metropolitan planning organizations and to establishment of a metropolitan planning organization for the Anchorage metropolitan area; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page TRA RPT 1DP 2DNP 1NR 1AM 1200 FN1: ZERO(DOT) 1200 CRA RPT 6NR 1426 FN1: ZERO(DOT) 1427 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 2, lines 8 - 9: Delete "whose district is located partially or wholly" Insert "who is elected from a district, of which more than 50 percent is located" Page 2, lines 13 - 14: Delete "whose district is located partially or wholly" Insert "who is elected from a district, of which more than 50 percent is located" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Kott objected. **The presence of Representative Mulder was noted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2001-05-03 House Journal Page 1511 SB 88 Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 21 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Berkowitz, Bunde, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Guess, Halcro, Hayes, Hudson, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Masek, McGuire, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Porter, Scalzi Nays: Chenault, Coghill, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Harris, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Meyer, Mulder, Ogan, Rokeberg, Stevens, Whitaker, Wilson Absent: Williams And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Representative James moved and asked unanimous consent that SB 88 am H be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. SB 88 am H was read the third time. **The presence of Representative Williams was noted. The question being: "Shall SB 88 am H pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 88 am H Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 22 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Coghill, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Harris, Hudson, James, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, McGuire, Meyer, Mulder, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Bunde, Cissna, Crawford, Croft, Davies, Guess, Halcro, Hayes, Joule, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Masek, Morgan, Moses, Murkowski, Scalzi And so, SB 88 am H passed the House. 2001-05-03 House Journal Page 1512 Representative James moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: SB 88 am H Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 28 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Bunde, Chenault, Coghill, Crawford, Dyson, Fate, Foster, Green, Harris, Hudson, James, Joule, Kohring, Kott, Lancaster, Masek, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Mulder, Murkowski, Ogan, Porter, Rokeberg, Stevens, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson Nays: Berkowitz, Cissna, Croft, Davies, Guess, Halcro, Hayes, Kapsner, Kerttula, Kookesh, Moses, Scalzi And so, the effective date clause was adopted. Representative Berkowitz gave notice of reconsideration of his vote on SB 88 am H.